I don't know how this will end but I am enjoying seeing Michale Mann exposed. When he put out the now well known hockey stick graph to illustrate man made global warming, many scientists called him out on it as did many regular people who had the sense to find the rest of the graph it was chopped from. The doubt didn't stop the globalists who want to control the world through climate from using it, heck they embraced it! But Mann became outraged at especially a particular article by Mark Sein on the National Review website, calling his graph out for what most of us see it and according to Mann, the defamation of his character.
He's finally having his day in court in a defamation trial and while it is barely being covered by the main stream news, it should be because it is quite entertaining. As MSN reported "In his post, Steyn commented on a separate article by Rand Simberg of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, who made a crude analogy between Mann and Sandusky. Simberg said Mann had “engaged in academic and scientific misconduct.” He added that Mann “could be said to be the Jerry Sandusky of climate change, except for, instead of molesting children, he has molested and tortured data in the service of politicized science that could have dire economic consequences for the nation and planet.”
One of the best tidbits I've gleaned so far is that Mann claimed to win a Nobel Peace Prize for his work and that it has been absolutely proven no such thing ever happened.
Articles related to what is going on are attached or linked below and will be updated with new developments.
