The clean coal technique was developed by scientists at The Ohio State University, with just $5 million in funding from the federal government, and took 15 years to achieve. Researchers have discovered a stunning new process that takes the energy from coal without burning it -- and removes virtually all of the pollution.


Fan discovered a way to heat coal, using iron-oxide pellets for an oxygen source and containing the reaction in a small, heated chamber from which pollutants cannot escape. The only waste product is therefore water and coal ash -- no greenhouse gases. As an added benefit, the metal from the iron-oxide can be recycled.

Fan’s process, called “coal-direct chemical looping,” has been proven in a small scale lab at OSU. The next step is to take it to a larger test facility in Alabama, and Fan believes the technology can be commercialized and used to power an energy plant within five to 10 years, if all goes smoothly. 


Some environmentalists are skeptical of the technology, and of the idea of clean coal in general.


“Claiming that coal is clean because it could be clean -- if a new technically unproven and economically dubious technology might be adopted -- is like someone claiming that belladonna is not poisonous because there is a new unproven safe pill under development,” wrote Donald Brown at liberal think tank Climate Progress.


Yet the federal Department of Energy believes that the process can create 20 megawatts to 50 megawatts by 2020, said Jared Ciferno, the agency’s director of coal and power-production research and development, in a statement. 

Attachments
Topics: clean energy, coal, co2
Rocky
Image that.  Clean coal.  I recall playing in my grandmother's coal bin......nothing dirtier than that.  Since we export coal to China and the surrounding nations and China suffers some serious pollution, it would be a good way to 'equalize' our 'debt' to third world countries.  I'm against Cap and ...
  • February 22, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Safari Woman
My grandparents and others in my family burned coal too. Yep it's dirty to touch! There is an experimental coal plant in my area and I don't know what they do there but it is very clean burning too. But if I get this right it isn't even burning it is a chemical response.
  • February 24, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Safari Woman
This is surprising news. I've become so paranoid that it makes me want to investigate who might be interested in buying up those old refineries.
  • February 23, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Ken Brock
no lol wave power baby!
  • February 25, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
T Christensen
Coal may never actually be the "Cleanest" source for energy, but today is not so very bad, and by far, less expensive to produce than from any other current source. BTU for BTU coal is king!

Oh and comparing any of our cities today with the way they were when coal was actually the only real fuel cho...
  • February 25, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Captcha Challenge
Reload Image
Type in the verification code above
Back To Top
TOP