Dear Republican Party,


I am already disgusted beyond words that not one of you have stood up against the obvious problems relating to the qualifications of Barack Obama to run for or serve as our President. We know too well about the fakery on his birth certificate, the hiding of his records, the social security number that belongs to a deceased man and we even heard from a real estate agent that he and Michelle may be tied to real estate fraud. That makes all of you either spineless or complicit with Treason and fraud against the United States of America and every citizen of this nation.


There is a very tiny part of me that wants to believe the upheaval that would have occurred if this had been challenged was a greater threat and danger than allowing it to continue on unchecked. And most days, I really don't buy it and especially when the history of Barack Hussein Obama could have and should have been investigated and exposed from day ONE. You GAVE him the election. Shame on YOU all.


And as if THAT isn't enough!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Now we have been hearing about Rubio running in 2016 even during the 2012 race. WHY? WHY when we know that there is considerable evidence and ongoing arguments that he does not meet the natural born citizen qualification laid out in the constitution?  (See links below) There are a few exceptions to my liking what Rubio has done or stands for and overall I believe he is likely a fine person doing a good job representing his constituents. This rant isn't about not liking Rubio, it is about wanting a constitutional candidate who can not be torn apart and ripped to shreds over an issue that you yourselves ignored when you had the chance to go after Obama.


For a long time I've seen both parties as one big fat happy elitist bunch of controlliacs who rarely look out for anyone other than themselves, their own power and their wallets. PLEASE if Rubio is in your opinion, qualified, then you have a lot of explaining to do! If you think we are being tough on this issue, just wait until the Democrats show up with their four year in the making plan to destroy him over the argument in spite of the fact that their own candidate for the last two elections is beyond questionable. I really want to know, why are you already pushing him on us when this issue is left hanging? Has it come down to that once we permitted a probable usurper, we are no longer to worry about the clause that was established to protect us from enemies who have no problem with patiently waiting to fulfill their agendas through multiple generations?


I'll be honest, if it weren't for the fact that in my state, I have to be registered to a party with a candidate running in order to vote in a primary, I would not be in your registry as a member. For that reason and simply because the Democrats have become the most corrupt lying bunch of communists I could have ever imagined running our government I stay on your list. But if you serve us up a candidate due to cultural heritage, sex or skin color and for no other reason other than to up the calculated odds of winning, that is it for me. I'll likely leave your list and just wait to vote against the lesser of two evils in the general election like I have for so many years now anyway.  Thinking back, I believe I have never had a favorite in the race. For once, please, give us a candidate that is worthy of our trust. America is falling fast. We need a hero unencumbered by controversy. We need a party that stands for something greater than itself, that being the spirit of the constitution and the FREEDOM and PROTECTIONS from tyranny that it affords.


DO THE RIGHT THING!


We are watching!


 

Attachments
Rocky
I would expect that in the same manner that common law evolves this could also pertain to the Constitution.  Acceptance = legality.   It would be a great embarrassment if the GOP adopted a practice that they raged over for four plus years.  If we haven't come up with a ironclad definition for 'natur...
  • March 9, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Cassie Simpson
Shame on us is right! Someone sent me a link to .. either a Harvard or some other snooty university that had a legal definition supposedly adopted by the US and it was to prove that no matter what Obama was qualified. I wish I could find it but that was a long time ago. 
  • March 10, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Cassie Simpson
I like Rubio but they better sort this out first!
  • March 10, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
William Davis Hall
Thank you for writing this. It echoes my thoughts very well. I want to know the same thing. And why haven't we defined natural born citizen? Or have we?
  • March 9, 2013
  • ·
  • Like
Captcha Challenge
Reload Image
Type in the verification code above
Back To Top
TOP