This article says abortion and birth rate will be the reason they lose. I've thought about it before but I don't know if it matters like it did a long time ago. It makes several good points in the argument for the conclusion but there are other things I don't think make sense such as it mentions that homosexuals won't reproduce but there is no evidence that homosexuals are made from the reproduction of other homosexuals that I can find. 


I still think it is an interesting article to point out that the Christian religion and it's protection of life caused a larger population of Christians vs how the liberals are proud of killing the unborn and what it means for the future for how the next generations will be raised.  


It says, “In The Rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark observes that Christian prohibition of abortion ande infanticide contributed to the success of the new religion. ‘Christian and pagan subcultures must have differed greatly in their fertility rates,’ Stark argues, so that ‘a superior birthrate also contributed to the success of the early church.’ Europe’s great recovery from the post-Roman depopulation began with it s final Christianization in the ninth century C.E. Its modern depopulation began with the failure of Christianity a millennium later.”[1]


Consider abortion, the ideological sacrament of the Left. Liberals glory in abortion. They proudly tell the world that they’ve killed their future. Blogger “Andrea Grimes of RH Reality Check and the Texas Observer (Both part of George Soros’ Media Consortium),” is calling for a Taco or Beer Challenge to support abortion. It’s a takeoff on the ice bucket challenge to raise money to find a cure for ALS.


Read more at http://godfatherpolitics....

Linda Mihalic
Islam is suffering massive numbers of freak births because of inbreeding among 1st cousins. So although they seem to have a high birth rate, they are producing monsters.
http://www.dailymail.co.u...
http://www.theguardian.co...
http://themuslimissue.wor...
http://www.nairaland.com/...
  • August 25, 2014
  • ·
  • Like
Angelina
Those poor creatures! Do you think this article's suggestion is generally correct that healthy birth rates will make a difference in future generations? I'm not sure if it is enough to cause them to lose in the way it is reported. Inbreeding is a terrible thing! We have known this for generations s...
  • August 25, 2014
  • ·
  • Like
Linda Mihalic
I'd have to think about this for a while because while what this author seems to be saying might have been true 1,000 years ago, I'm betting that birth control is now viewed as a woman's prerogative. Further, women die young when forced to bear children constantly. I just think this issue is way mor...
  • August 25, 2014
  • ·
  • Like
Safari Woman
agree
  • August 25, 2014
  • ·
  • Like
Rocky
It's the replacement birth rate that makes a difference. In order for a society to remain the same in number, each woman must have 2.1 children and in America as well as Western Europe, childbirth for non Muslims is far below the replacement rate.

On the other hand, Muslims can have more than one wi...
  • August 25, 2014
  • ·
  • Like
Safari Woman
Things were So different then and populations had not reached such a mass as they are now. I don't think this will be the cause of any group to lose in the way this article suggests.
  • August 25, 2014
  • ·
  • Like
Captcha Challenge
Reload Image
Type in the verification code above
Back To Top
TOP